The Mother Divine
Change Font Size 
 Home
IS INDIA CIVILIZED: ANTHOLOGY OF EXTRACTS
From Sir John Woodroff (Compiled by Deb Kumar Chakraborti)



The Early English settlers first engaged in trade and then in conquest, they did not concern themselves with what the Indian believed or did in matters not directly and materially affecting themselves. Their energies were devoted to the security of their position and trade. However, with the gradual settlement of the country after the Battle of Plassey, English culture was brought to bear on it. The most important happening in the first half of the 19th century was the defeat of the orientalist party amongst the English in India and the determination to forward the teaching of the English language.

The importance of this decision cannot be over-rated, for thereby English ideas and ideals came in time to spread throughout the land and even got accepted by some of its people in place of their own. The taut of the famous minute of 1835 was the resolution of the Government of Lord William Bentinck “that the great object of the British Government ought to be the promotion of European literature and science amongst the natives of India and that all the funds appropriated for the purpose of education would be best employed in English education alone.” Sir Charles Wood's dispatch of 1854 furthered English education and resulted in the formation of a department of Public Instruction together with the outline of a University system. From this time forward, English education was more and more organized in Government hands. Even private schools were subject to a system of inspection so as to approximate those institutions to the ideals and efficiency of government schools.

All this is part of the process whereby a dominant race at first works by force of arms, and then, when free to do so, by cultural assimilation. Wherever there is resistance to such assimilation, there is a conflict of culture and ideals. A cultural conquest means the subjection and, may be, the destruction of the psychic possessions of the racial soul which is then transformed into the nature of that of the victor. Language affords a notable example of such cultural dominance. People who abandon or are compelled to abandon their language for that of another, lose themselves.

Only a race’s own language can express its soul. Those who speak a foreign tongue will tend to think in foreign thoughts; those who think in foreign thoughts will have foreign ways and so forth. For these reasons, dominant peoples have sought to impose their language on subject races as the completion of their conquest. (Now a days) Indian boys are sent to missionary schools or schools conducted by Christians, from which some students have returned to their homes in the belief that their parents (if they themselves had any belief) were dark ‘heathens’. In this way, the Indian dharma is being lost and often no other definite conception of life and its duties has been acquired in its stead.

To an Indian, self-conscious of the greatness of his country’s civilization, it must be gall and wormwood to hear others speaking of the ‘education’ and ‘civilization’ of India. India, who has taught some of the deepest truths which our race has known, is to be ‘educated'’. She whose ancient civilization ranks with the greatest the world has known is to be ‘civilized’.

That great man and orientalist Sir William Jonee said, “It is impossible to read the Vedanta or the many fine compositions in illustration of it, without believing that Pythagoras and Plato derived their sublime theories from the same fountain with the sages of India.” The celebrated French historian of philosophy, Victor Cousin wrote: “when we read with attention the poetical and philosophical monuments of the East, above all those of India, which are beginning to spread in Europe, we discover there many a truth and truths so profound, and which make such contrast with the meanness of the results at which European genius has sometimes stopped, that we are constrained to bend the knee before the philosophy of the East and see in this cradle of the human race the native land of the highest philosophy.”

Professor Lowes-Dickinson, in an essay which seeks with justice to define the character of Indian civilization, profoundly remarks that it is so unique that the contrast is not so much between East and West as between India and the rest of the world. Thus, India stands for something which distinguishes it from all other peoples, and so she calls herself Karma-bhumi as opposed to Bhoga-bhumi of all other peoples. For this, she has been wonderfully preserved until today. Even now (and in this consists one cause of the extra-ordinary interest which India arouses) we can see the life of thousands of years ago. Standing at the Ghats of Banaras or by any village well, we are transported into the beautiful antique world.

I have in mind not any soiled and hybrid developments of the time, but the principles of the civilization of old India, with its Dharma, Devata and Gomata, a civilization in its depths profound, on its surface a pageant of antique beauty — the civilization of India, of the Hindus.

But this is only one side of the picture; on the other side critics like Mr. Archer have waged severe attacks on India and her culture. Comparing Indian and European art he says, “The difference almost amounts to that between fine art and barbarism.” About the Indian epics he says, “The Mahabharata is in no way behind the Ramayana in crudity and extravagance, it is in many respects the more barbarous of the two.” As for Indian architecture, “It is a disease of gigantesque barbarism.” As for the Indian Gods, “Ganesha is the pot-bellied falstaff of Hinduism,” and so forth.

Here two facts may be noted. The first is that there must be something peculiar in Indian civilization which is the cause of this animosity. The second is the proof such attacks afford of the living force of this civilization. No-one now goes into moral hysteria over the absurdities or the inequities of Phoenician, Carthaginian or the Babylonian civilization. They are dead and gone, but India lives. Up to now, India has presented itself as one of the ‘immortal peoples’, to use the word of some French writer whose name I forget. Suffering racial and social division, politically disrupted, with a great variety of languages and scripts, governed for centuries by strangers, yet she has held together so that she can still speak of ‘India’. This, I think, is due primarily to certain religious and philosophical concepts held in common by her people — and as regard Hinduism in its technical sense—the wonderful organization called Varnashrama dharma, I have, therefore, my moments of angry wonder as I see the increasing vulgarization of the fine and (in an eastern sense) aristocratic life of India, the betrayal or neglect of past traditions and culture, the senseless imitations of foreign ways simply because they are foreign and the many shams and falsities of modern Indian life. How many Europeans have been even in partial degree “Hinduized” (if then term can be applied to any) as compared to the thousands who have been anglicized.

The glamour which attends a dominant race produces amongst the imitative the ‘have a drink’ and ‘so English’ Indian; the type which bans ‘native dress’ from his club because it is ‘run on European lines’ and brings up his children in ‘Indian Etons’ to segregate them from the common run of Indian folk. If attention has not been paid to Indian culture (by the British rulers), it is primarily due to the fact that the English-educated sections of the community have not, as a rule, made any demand for it. Some of them are quite content with ‘Indian Etons’ and the like.

Speaking of the present political situation of India, while political home-rule might be attained through the adoption of the civilization of the foreign ruler, there would in such case, no longer be a home (in the Indian sense) to rule. Those who then ruled themselves would be an alias of their departed rulers; a people who, in the language of Macaulay, would be Englishmen in everything but colour.

It was Swami Vivekananda who said that, “When India becomes English, if this be so, all intermediate steps towards such a result spell weakness, India is now about to be drawn into the world-whirlpool wherein she must herself struggle to preserve herself.”

(It has already been pointed out that India is the native land of the highest philosophy.)

India was destined to be Jagatguru — the spiritual teacher of the world.

I believe that the principles of Indian civilization are of great value. Without belittling those of others, I think that it will be to the benefit 0f the world at large that it should haw the help of the Indian people infused by the Indian spirit, and not servile imitators for whom we Westerners have no place. We have no need for disciplines in matters in which we are the masters. In order that Indian culture should take its place in the world, it is necessary that the Indian spirit, which has produced that culture, should be fostered, this is for the good of the world. Whatever be our race, we should all render our service, and thus behave like a friend to every other friend of the world. (Jagadbandhu.)